<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freelensing photography technique</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/archives/freelensing-photography-technique/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/archives/freelensing-photography-technique</link>
	<description>Graphic design, art, and other creative inspiration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:52:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/archives/freelensing-photography-technique/comment-page-1#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/?p=856#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>Um, you state that your aperture will be 0.  That&#039;s not true.  Your aperture is just going to be the maximum that your lens will allow, but your camera will read 00 because there&#039;s no lens attached.  Removing the lens doesn&#039;t somehow magically make it wider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, you state that your aperture will be 0.  That&#8217;s not true.  Your aperture is just going to be the maximum that your lens will allow, but your camera will read 00 because there&#8217;s no lens attached.  Removing the lens doesn&#8217;t somehow magically make it wider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/archives/freelensing-photography-technique/comment-page-1#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/?p=856#comment-1174</guid>
		<description>Very cool technique! Thanks for the video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool technique! Thanks for the video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/archives/freelensing-photography-technique/comment-page-1#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/?p=856#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>BTW: The aperture is still the same as before, only with lenses with f-stop 1.0 it is 1.0. It cold be, that teh camera writes some nonses into the EXIFs, but the diameter of the lens entrance pupil didn´t increase when the lens is unmounted :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW: The aperture is still the same as before, only with lenses with f-stop 1.0 it is 1.0. It cold be, that teh camera writes some nonses into the EXIFs, but the diameter of the lens entrance pupil didn´t increase when the lens is unmounted :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/archives/freelensing-photography-technique/comment-page-1#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/?p=856#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>One could easily build a DIY tilt lens with a front and back cap and a black ballon - and some glue. That reducves the dust problem. Or, with dust but also with infinity: One could use a Canon FD lens /28/2.8 is tested) and remove the bajonett. Works great on EOS 350D:
http://4photos.de/camera-diy/tilt_and_shift.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One could easily build a DIY tilt lens with a front and back cap and a black ballon &#8211; and some glue. That reducves the dust problem. Or, with dust but also with infinity: One could use a Canon FD lens /28/2.8 is tested) and remove the bajonett. Works great on EOS 350D:<br />
<a href="http://4photos.de/camera-diy/tilt_and_shift.html" rel="nofollow">http://4photos.de/camera-diy/tilt_and_shift.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/archives/freelensing-photography-technique/comment-page-1#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/?p=856#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>Yes, dust on the sensor is a risk when doing this.  Don&#039;t do it if that worries you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, dust on the sensor is a risk when doing this.  Don&#8217;t do it if that worries you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/archives/freelensing-photography-technique/comment-page-1#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/?p=856#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>If your camera is on and you&#039;re doing this, would the electric charge going through the sensor not attract dust particles to the sensor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your camera is on and you&#8217;re doing this, would the electric charge going through the sensor not attract dust particles to the sensor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
